dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: [Fwd: VersionLockingPolicy in documentation and code is different]

From: Tom Ware <tom.ware_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:02:46 -0500

Hi,

  I do not seem to be able to follow the link below at the moment, but I
am wondering if this is the documentation for the Oracle TopLink
product, or for the open source TopLink Essentials product that is
shipped as part of glassfish. Given that the link is a ".oracle" link,
I suspect you are looking at documentation for the Oracle TopLink product.

  The package names for the two products are different in the way you
have described below and there are some differences in the functionality
of the two products.

  I suspect that is the reason for the differences you are seeing.

Best Regards,
Tom

Shreedhar Ganapathy wrote:

> Forwarding to dev alias.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: VersionLockingPolicy in documentation and code is different
> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:44:03 +0200
> From: Tiomkin Yasmin <Yasmin.Tiomkin_at_starhome.com>
> Reply-To: feedback_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> To: feedback_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The VersionLockingPolicy class documentation says it has a function
> setIsCascaded. It also says this class is in package*
> oracle.toplink.descriptors*
>
> _http://download-uk.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/ias/preview/web.1013/b13698/index.html_
>
> The problem is that in both Oracle jars download and glassfish
> download site this function is in package*
> oracle.toplink.**essentials**.descriptors* and it does not have this
> function.
>
>
> *Best Regards,***
>
>
> *Yasmin Tiomkin*
> *R&D*
> 14 Hatidhar Street
> Raanana 43665, Israel
> Tel. +972-3-7678235
> Fax. +972-3-7655688
> Mobile. +972-54-4438078
> _yasmin.tiomkin_at_starhome.com_ <mailto:yasmin.tiomkin_at_starhome.com>
> _www.starhome.com_ <http://www.starhome.com/>
>
>
> ****************************************
> This email message contains confidential, commercial and privileged
> information or material that is proprietary and confidential
> information of Starhome.
>