IMHO, 9.0 pe v2 seems wrong. It seems to me it is either GF v2 or
9.1(pe)...
Is this (conceptual) map incorrect?
9.0 <-> GF (v1)
9.0 UR1 <-> GF v1 UR1
9.1 (pe) <-> GF v2
9.{2/5} (pe) <-> GF v3
- eduard/o
Carla Mott wrote:
> You're right. I think that issue tracker should use v1_ur1 and v2
> bug track should stay as is and bug bridge should do the
> mapping.
> Carla
>
> Marina Vatkina wrote:
>
>> Hi Carla,
>>
>> Isn't 9.0pev2 even more confusing than 9.1pe? I thought that v2 is
>> just v2 (as in GlassFish v2). With v1-UR1 in picture, I think we should
>> either switch completely to vX or stay with 9.X, but not mix and match
>> in between.
>>
>> My $.02.
>> -marina
>>
>> Carla Mott wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure we can should bugtraq because it reflects our products.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have the bug bridge do the mapping vs all the
>>> developers and user of GlassFish. Most of the SQE folks know that
>>> 9.1pe (bugtraq) == 9.0pev2 (isssuetracker) not sure if that is true
>>> of the GlassFish community.
>>>
>>> my 2 cents
>>> carla
>>>
>>> Deepa Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Amy,
>>>> I would like version in bugtraq and issuetracker to be same as I am
>>>> using version field as-is from both places.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, bugtraq too has release for 9.1pe, 9.0peur1.
>>>>
>>>> If this were to change , i.e 9.1pe bugtraq == 9.0pev2 isssuetracker,
>>>> it would confuse our internal SQE team, and also,make bug management
>>>> difficult.
>>>>
>>>> Can we change version in internal bugtraq as well?
>>>> (We should all move to external issuetracker for PE, but there are
>>>> some subcategories, for which there are no corresponding
>>>> subcomponents in issuetracker for PE)
>>>>
>>>> Amy Roh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> There has been some confusion regarding target milestone due to the
>>>>> fact that we're using different names for GlassFish promoted
>>>>> bundles and issue tracker target milestone.
>>>>>
>>>>> We're currently using 9.1pe... (sun internal) in issue tracker but
>>>>> v2... for promoted bundles which is causing some confusion on
>>>>> version names.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm proposing we get rid of 9.1pe from issue tracker and to change
>>>>> it to v2 so we're consistent with promoted builds. I'll have to
>>>>> talk to Deepa regarding bugbridge impact but I'm assuming it won't
>>>>> be a significant change but a simple mapping. Correct me if I'm
>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Amy
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>