You're right. I think that issue tracker should use v1_ur1 and v2
bug track should stay as is and bug bridge should do the
mapping.
Carla
Marina Vatkina wrote:
> Hi Carla,
>
> Isn't 9.0pev2 even more confusing than 9.1pe? I thought that v2 is
> just v2 (as in GlassFish v2). With v1-UR1 in picture, I think we should
> either switch completely to vX or stay with 9.X, but not mix and match
> in between.
>
> My $.02.
> -marina
>
> Carla Mott wrote:
>
>> Not sure we can should bugtraq because it reflects our products.
>>
>> It would be nice to have the bug bridge do the mapping vs all the
>> developers and user of GlassFish. Most of the SQE folks know that
>> 9.1pe (bugtraq) == 9.0pev2 (isssuetracker) not sure if that is true
>> of the GlassFish community.
>>
>> my 2 cents
>> carla
>>
>> Deepa Singh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Amy,
>>> I would like version in bugtraq and issuetracker to be same as I am
>>> using version field as-is from both places.
>>>
>>> Currently, bugtraq too has release for 9.1pe, 9.0peur1.
>>>
>>> If this were to change , i.e 9.1pe bugtraq == 9.0pev2 isssuetracker,
>>> it would confuse our internal SQE team, and also,make bug management
>>> difficult.
>>>
>>> Can we change version in internal bugtraq as well?
>>> (We should all move to external issuetracker for PE, but there are
>>> some subcategories, for which there are no corresponding
>>> subcomponents in issuetracker for PE)
>>>
>>> Amy Roh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There has been some confusion regarding target milestone due to the
>>>> fact that we're using different names for GlassFish promoted
>>>> bundles and issue tracker target milestone.
>>>>
>>>> We're currently using 9.1pe... (sun internal) in issue tracker but
>>>> v2... for promoted bundles which is causing some confusion on
>>>> version names.
>>>>
>>>> I'm proposing we get rid of 9.1pe from issue tracker and to change
>>>> it to v2 so we're consistent with promoted builds. I'll have to
>>>> talk to Deepa regarding bugbridge impact but I'm assuming it won't
>>>> be a significant change but a simple mapping. Correct me if I'm
>>>> wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Any comments?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Amy
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>