Resending to a larger audience for input.
-marina
Hale India wrote:
> Hi Sanjeeb
>
> Thank you for this information.
> When you say that they work together you mean :
> 1) Glassfish can be compile with mustang ?
> 2) WS made using embeded JAX-WS in mustang can be
> deployed in Glassfish compile with mustang ?
> 2) WS made using embedded JAX-WS in mustang can be
> deployed in Glassfish compile with java 1.5 ?
> 3) clients made with mustang can use WS of any
> Glassfish ?
>
> Excuse all these question, but a start a new release
> of our project to be deliver end of this year) and I
> try to define what to use to start. We move to EBJ3.0
> it is the only thing decided by today ...
>
> Thank's
>
> Andre
> --- Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM> wrote:
>
>
>>Marina Vatkina wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Andre,
>>>
>>>If you look here:
>>>
>>
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/ServerModules.html
>
>>you will
>>
>>>see that GlassFish supports both, EJB2.1 and EJB
>>
>>3.0.
>>
>>>Current version of GlassFish works with JDK 1.5.
>>
>>It will work with
>>
>>>Mustang in the future.
>>
>>Even today, GlassFish works with Mustang. No change,
>>what so ever.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sahoo
>>
>>
>>>regards,
>>>-marina
>>>
>>>Hale India wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>If we look at
>>>>
>>>>
>>
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/nonav/javaee5/docs/DG/beahl.html
>
>>>>Glassfish support EJB2.1
>>>>
>>>>If we look at :
>>>>
>>
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/persistence/entity-persistence-support.html#getting_started
>
>>>>
>>>>Glassfish persistence is done by EJB3 and connect
>>
>>us to the link :
>>
>>>>http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=220
>>>>
>>>>I would like to understand better and for this I
>>
>>need a clear answer
>>
>>>>EJB2.1 ? EJB3.0 ? both ?
>>>>
>>>>I see also in JAVA mustang new support for JDBC
>>
>>where database
>>
>>>>provide service , and where JAVA mustang offer
>>
>>native support for
>>
>>>>JAX-WS 2.0
>>>>I ask myself how Glassfish will be connected to
>>
>>mustang, will we need
>>
>>>>to wait for a new glassfish release to get
>>
>>support for mustang ?
>>
>>>>Are they designed to work together ?
>>>>
>>>>Any answer welcome
>>>>
>>>>Best regards
>>>>
>>>>Andre Legendre
>>>
>>