dev@ws-test-harness.java.net

Re: Security Status after WSIT JAXWS 2.1 Migration

From: Jiandong Guo <Jiandong.Guo_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:00:09 -0700

Hi Ken,

The addressing uri was seeting wrong for these cases. I updated them.
They should all be working now.

Thanks!

Jiandong

Ken Hofsass wrote:

> Hi Manveen, Jiandong,
>
> The security & SC tests that you are running, are they standalone
> tests or using the e2e harness [1]? Hudson shows 4 failures for
> security & two for SC even with the latest changes (which fixed the
> other XWSS & SC test failures).
>
> If you're using the harness, how did you run your tests? (that is,
> 'ant' or directly with 'java') What transport did you use? (local or
> http)
>
> I'm asking because I want to make sure the e2e harness is working
> properly, esp. on hudson. And since e2e test runs on hudson are not
> showing the same results, I'm trying to figure out what's causing the
> discrepancy.
>
> thanks,
> Ken
>
> [1] http://kohsuke.sfbay/hudson/job/wsit-e2e-test-local
>
> Manveen Kaur wrote:
>
>> Arun Gupta wrote:
>>
>>> [s/pteam/tech]
>>>
>>> The WSDL does not have any UsingAddressing assertion. I added that
>>> assertion (in W3C namespace) for xwss/s1 and the saw the correct set
>>> of WS-A headers on request and response message. However if I change
>>> the UsingAddressing namespace to MemberSubmission then I can
>>> reproduce this NPE.
>>>
>>> I fixed the problem in JAX-WS and
>>> AddressingModelConfiguratorProvider and now can see the correct set
>>> of WS-A headers in xwss/s1 and s2 scenarios. I tried s1 in both W3C
>>> and Member submission and saw the correct headers.
>>>
>>> Manveen/Jiandong,
>>>
>>> Can you try rest of the scenarios and let me know if you see any
>>> other issues ?
>>>
>>> -Arun
>>
>>
>> Just to confirm that I also ran all the security e2e tests and they
>> passed with the latest fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Manveen
>
>