Bobby Bissett wrote:
>>
>> OK. I'm hoping that not many tests will use it, so I think we should
>> just let test data include this file.
>
> That sounds best. We shouldn't work too hard on it since it won't happen
> much. If a lot of people start dropping handlers into tests, we can make
> a simple list syntax for people to use (since it's not a goal of ours to
> test every bit of the jax-ws handler code). You're right that the short
> hand doesn't save a lot.
Sounds good.
>> Is this one per endpoint? Or is this one per service? Is this something
>> the harness can find by using a convention, or does it something the
>> user need to write to test descriptor?
>
> It's one per service, so at the most there would be two files (client
> and server). I think we could have a simple convention
> "client-handlers.xml" and "server-handlers.xml" that people could drop
> in and the files would look just like the one I attached to an email
> earlier.
+1.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com