Re: Package names

From: Farrukh Najmi <>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:50:23 -0400

Marc Hadley wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>> Marc Hadley wrote:
>>> It would be good if people already using the plug-ins don't have to
>>> go back and edit their build because of class name changes, e.g. the
>>> ant task. If folks really want
>>> to move to a new package then we could keep the old class and simply
>>> defer to the renamed class for backwards compatibility.
>> As an implementor and user of wadl2java I would be faced with that
>> impact. However, it is a small impact.
>> Since we have not ever released WADL, I propose we sort these issues
>> out now rather than post 1.0 release.
>> Also, much of the work has already been done for the name change. It
>> would be painful to undo it now.
>> Can we please keep the name change?
> I'm OK with the package change, I'm just suggesting we put in a
> wrapper with the old package name to preserve backwards compatibility,
> e.g.:
> package;
> public class WJCTask extends org.jvnet...WJCTask {}
> I don't know how many people are actively using the code now and I
> agree its a small change to switch the ant taskdef but its even easier
> for us to include a wrapper with the old name. I'll be happy to add
> the class once you are done with the other maven related changes.

I get it now. Sounds good. Thanks.