Do you have any use cases in mind that cannot be achieved by previous
upgrade proposal and need to have the provider discovery?
Thanks.
Shing Wai Chan
On 10/18/11 1:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 09:39 +1100, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> However, my major concern is still that we give the container an
>> opportunity to provide it's own protocol implementation rather than
>> the applications. So something like the protocol provider discovery
>> mechanism is a priority for me.
> Yes, I agree, builtin support is far more important. Application level
> implementation would likely be more complex and less efficient.
>
> I am possibly ok with adding application level protocols, but so far
> Greg convinced me this was useless. All we really need to do is
> something to tell the container to handoff to another builtin protocol
> (so, websockets).
>
> On a side note, we could take the separate protocol out of the equation,
> as this could also be nice to do HTTP proxying, for example to be able
> to tell the container to proxy a connection to another HTTP server. So
> this could be a generic handoff mechanism.
>