On Dec 8, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Joel Smith wrote:
>
> Does this mean that the EJB and EE spec leads will be making updates
> in the appropriate specs to support this solution?
>
Yes, the same proposal has also been circulated to those EGs for
feedback.
> I was also wondering about the scope of this solution, will there be
> efforts to update traditional web services i.e. JAX.WS with this
> solution as well?
>
That I don't know though presumably the same facilities will be useful
there too.
Marc.
>
>
>
> Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM>
> Sent by: Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM
> 12/08/2008 03:01 PM
> Please respond to
> dev_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
>
> To
> dev_at_jsr311.dev.java.net
> cc
> Subject
> Re: JSR311: JAX-RS and EJB
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:35 PM, Joel Smith wrote:
>
> >
> > Why is metadata being defined to provide for a JNDI name which will
> > be used to bind the JAX-RS/EJB instance?
> >
> To solve problem (i) described below. Basically a JAX-RS runtime needs
> a portable way to get an instance to dispatch requests to.
>
> Marc.
>
---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.