Re: Removing _at_UnmatchedPath

From: Julian Reschke <>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:52:31 +0200

Bill de hOra wrote:
> ...
> I prefer the new version for the API. However, if I read the uri
> templates draft right, I think greedy is the default - it doesn't
> support any operators/quantifiers but says any legal URI tokens can go
> inside the brackets. So if I had (assuming greedy)
> ...

I think we really really need to have progress on the URI template spec
before relying on it's syntax. The question about whether a template is
restricted to path elements, and, if not, how escaping will work, has
been open for way too long.

Best regards, Julian