Bill de hOra wrote:
> ...
> I prefer the new version for the API. However, if I read the uri
> templates draft right, I think greedy is the default - it doesn't
> support any operators/quantifiers but says any legal URI tokens can go
> inside the brackets. So if I had (assuming greedy)
> ...
I think we really really need to have progress on the URI template spec
before relying on it's syntax. The question about whether a template is
restricted to path elements, and, if not, how escaping will work, has
been open for way too long.
Best regards, Julian