Thanks, Gordon.
Folks, I plan to remove AttributeNode.getType(). Yell now if you disagree.
-Linda
On 1/17/2013 12:44 PM, Gordon Yorke wrote:
> Perhaps but they are practically the same thing in this case and I do not see a clear use case for this information
> especially since there is no way to inspect the related subgraphs of the attribute node. It would be far more helpful to
> add getSubgraphs() getKeySubgraphs() as a starting point for EntityGraph inspection.
> --Gordon
>
> On 17/01/2013 4:14 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> On 1/17/2013 12:06 PM, Gordon Yorke wrote:
>>> Building on Ollie's feedback with respect to BindableType I was reviewing AttributeNode.getType() and see this method as
>>> having very little value and unnecessarily crowds the interface. Given the stage we are at with delivering the
>>> specifiation I suggest we simply remove this method for now and provide other methods that add value to the interface in
>>> the future.
>>
>> Would it be useful to simply return the Java type rather than Type?
>>
>>
>>
>