Perhaps but they are practically the same thing in this case and I do
not see a clear use case for this information especially since there is
no way to inspect the related subgraphs of the attribute node. It would
be far more helpful to add getSubgraphs() getKeySubgraphs() as a
starting point for EntityGraph inspection.
--Gordon
On 17/01/2013 4:14 PM, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
> Hi Gordon,
>
> On 1/17/2013 12:06 PM, Gordon Yorke wrote:
>> Building on Ollie's feedback with respect to BindableType I was
>> reviewing AttributeNode.getType() and see this method as
>> having very little value and unnecessarily crowds the interface.
>> Given the stage we are at with delivering the
>> specifiation I suggest we simply remove this method for now and
>> provide other methods that add value to the interface in
>> the future.
>
> Would it be useful to simply return the Java type rather than Type?
>
>
>