users@jpa-spec.java.net

[jpa-spec users] [jsr338-experts] Re: question regarding jta-data-source

From: michael keith <michael.keith_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:42:43 -0400

Christian,

Non-JDBC data sources are typically deployed in the form of resource
adapters, using the connector SPI.
JPA was designed for JDBC data sources and drivers, not other kinds of
back end data. The spec can't help you, there.

-Mike

On 14/05/2012 4:17 AM, Christian Romberg wrote:
> Hi Michael and Pinaki,
>
> Yes, I understood how this is supposed to work, however this does not
> and can not work for us this way out-of-the box.
>
> I think I forgot to emphasize, that we are not an ORM and are not
> using JDBC connections.
>
> Of course we can (and would) register a Synchronization object with
> the global transaction.
>
> But where should the container get the XAResource from? Because we are
> not using JDBC connections, which implies, we
> are not using any DataSource. So there is simply no way for the app
> server to drive the XA protocol.
>
> Unless of course, we would provide a "fake" XADataSource in a "fake"
> JDBC driver, and given the pseudo-code assumption
> from my previous mail, we would then just call "getConnection()" on
> the jta-data-source (which points to an app server pool
> configured with our "fake" JDBC driver, configured to return enlisted
> connections) and don't actually use the result
> of the "getConnection()" invocation (which is a dummy implementation
> anyways)
>
> I'm pretty sure, that my pseudo-code assumption is correct, mostly
> because I can not think of any other straight-forward
> (or even weird) way how to implement that in the app server.
>
> So this would be the way to go for us.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45 PM, michael keith
> <michael.keith_at_oracle.com <mailto:michael.keith_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Yes, that's pretty much how it works.
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 11/05/2012 9:45 AM, Christian Romberg wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Unlike ORMs, we need to provide the XAResource instances to the
>> app server
>> (which in turn are associated with our internal connections to
>> the database server)
>>
>> But I guess, if the user just sees a DataSource, then that will
>> be an app server proxy which eventually delegates to the
>> XADataSource of
>> our "JDBC" driver (provided I configure a DataSource that returns
>> enlisted connection in the app server using our JDBC driver)
>>
>> So my pseudo-code assumption of the app servers DataSource proxy
>> is like this:
>>
>> public class ContainerDataSourceProxy implements DataSource {
>>
>> XADataSource xaDs = ...; //XADataSource of the installed
>> JDBC driver for this pool
>>
>> public Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
>> XAConnection xaCon = xaDs.getXAConnection();
>> enlist(xaCon.getXAResource());
>> return xaCon.getConnection();
>> }
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> So we could simply call getConnection() (and not using the
>> returned value at all) to trigger the app servers
>> enlisting our XAResource.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, michael keith
>> <michael.keith_at_oracle.com <mailto:michael.keith_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> The data source referenced by the jta-data-source name is a
>> DataSource provided by the container in JNDI. It is the same
>> one that any application could look up and use, hence it is a
>> javax.sql.DataSource.
>>
>> XADataSource is an internal type used by the driver and
>> container to coordinate XA, but users of the data source are
>> not expected to participate at that level. The JPA provider
>> acts like a client of the data source, using its connections
>> to read and write, so it does not need to be aware of the XA
>> protocol being implemented underneath.
>>
>> Hope this makes things clearer.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On 10/05/2012 7:50 AM, Christian Romberg wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> It is not explicitly mentioned in the spec, but I guess I
>>> can safely assume, that the data source denoted by
>>> jta-data-source is of type "javax.sql.XADataSource"?
>>>
>>> After the JPA implementation has obtained an XAConnection
>>> from this XADataSource, is it expected to
>>> to do any calls (and if so, in any specific order) on this
>>> XAConnection?
>>>
>>> E.g. is it necessary, to call XAConnection.getConnection()
>>> to trigger that the app server calls
>>> XAConnection.getXAResource()
>>> on the very same XAConnection? Or is it sufficient to just
>>> call "XADataSource.getXAConnection()" to trigger this?
>>>
>>> (Some background: we don't use JDBC connections (being not
>>> an ORM) and probably we would need to provide our own
>>> XADataSource implementation, so that the app server picks up
>>> our own XAResource implementation)
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Romberg
>>> Chief Engineer| Versant GmbH
>>> (T) +49 40 60990-0 <tel:%2B49%2040%2060990-0>
>>> (F) +49 40 60990-113 <tel:%2B49%2040%2060990-113>
>>> (E) cromberg_at_versant.com <mailto:cromberg_at_versant.com>
>>> www.versant.com
>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.versant.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeeEBc_gN_8mxtt8xDB0tjXDXQVlw>|
>>> www.db4o.com
>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.db4o.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzdo3Q40RwKQPBtnPIuBYQd1diFxJQ>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Versant
>>> GmbH is incorporated in Germany. Company registration
>>> number: HRB
>>> 54723, Amtsgericht Hamburg. Registered Office: Halenreie 42,
>>> 22359
>>> Hamburg, Germany. Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Wöbker, Volker John
>>>
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY
>>> NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
>>> for the sole
>>> use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>>> confidential or
>>> proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>>> disclosure or
>>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient,
>>> immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
>>> all copies of
>>> the original message.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Romberg
>> Chief Engineer| Versant GmbH
>> (T) +49 40 60990-0 <tel:%2B49%2040%2060990-0>
>> (F) +49 40 60990-113 <tel:%2B49%2040%2060990-113>
>> (E) cromberg_at_versant.com <mailto:cromberg_at_versant.com>
>> www.versant.com
>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.versant.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeeEBc_gN_8mxtt8xDB0tjXDXQVlw>|
>> www.db4o.com
>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.db4o.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzdo3Q40RwKQPBtnPIuBYQd1diFxJQ>
>>
>> --
>> Versant
>> GmbH is incorporated in Germany. Company registration number: HRB
>> 54723, Amtsgericht Hamburg. Registered Office: Halenreie 42, 22359
>> Hamburg, Germany. Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Wöbker, Volker John
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY
>> NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for
>> the sole
>> use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or
>> proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
>> immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
>> copies of
>> the original message.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Romberg
> Chief Engineer| Versant GmbH
> (T) +49 40 60990-0
> (F) +49 40 60990-113
> (E) cromberg_at_versant.com <mailto:cromberg_at_versant.com>
> www.versant.com
> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.versant.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeeEBc_gN_8mxtt8xDB0tjXDXQVlw>|
> www.db4o.com
> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.db4o.com%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzdo3Q40RwKQPBtnPIuBYQd1diFxJQ>
>
> --
> Versant
> GmbH is incorporated in Germany. Company registration number: HRB
> 54723, Amtsgericht Hamburg. Registered Office: Halenreie 42, 22359
> Hamburg, Germany. Geschäftsführer: Bernhard Wöbker, Volker John
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY
> NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole
> use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or
> proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of
> the original message.
>
>
>