jsr343-experts@jms-spec.java.net: by thread

[jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 1 08:36:37 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-25) Standardise the interface between a JMS provider and a Java EE application server Nigel Deakin (Thu Feb 7 07:54:22 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-48) Rules on calling consumer.close() Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 12 06:40:24 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-40) Dropping noLocal from shared subscriptions Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 12 09:19:11 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 4 11:39:36 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-73) Define how messages from a topic are delivered to clustered application server instances Nigel Deakin (Thu Feb 7 10:05:04 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-96 & 97) Define Java EE connection factory and destination definition annotations and descriptor elements Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 11 07:59:13 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 1 07:14:54 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 8 07:44:24 2013)
  - [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 8 07:54:11 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: JMS 2.0 Late update: JMSProducer.getPropertyNames() John D. Ament (Fri Feb 1 09:57:30 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Late change: A.3.2 Meaning of noLocal with shared topic subscriptions Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 1 06:30:15 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 1 07:38:25 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: Late change: A.3.1 Delivery delay (Issue 2: behaviour of QueueBrowser) John Archbold (Thu Feb 7 13:25:43 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 1 08:07:49 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 4 02:47:18 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: [jms-spec users] Re: Re: Late issue: Calling MessageConsumer#close from onMessage Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 11 08:47:01 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 PR: Feedback from Goldman Sachs Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 4 03:52:21 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: JMS 2.0 PR: Feedback from Goldman Sachs Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 6 05:23:11 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Collecting issues for JMS 2.next? John D. Ament (Mon Feb 4 16:20:06 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: Collecting issues for JMS 2.next? Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 5 07:28:27 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public draft review now complete Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 6 11:29:44 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Specification Document - Reorganisation Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 6 11:32:31 2013)
[jsr343-experts] Inconsistence on Javadoc regarding XAQueueConnection and XAConnection Clebert Suconic (Tue Feb 12 13:54:52 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: Inconsistence on Javadoc regarding XAQueueConnection and XAConnection Nigel Deakin (Thu Feb 14 06:21:02 2013)
  - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-114) Clarify javadoc descriptions of XAQueueConnection#createSession and XATopicSession#createSession Nigel Deakin (Thu Feb 14 06:47:28 2013)
    - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-114) Clarify javadoc descriptions of XAQueueConnection#createSession and XATopicSession#createSession Clebert Suconic (Thu Feb 14 06:49:26 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Public Review Ballot complete Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 19 01:35:01 2013)
[jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 19 08:48:43 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue John D. Ament (Tue Feb 19 08:56:57 2013)
  - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue Nigel Deakin (Tue Feb 19 09:50:38 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue Clebert Suconic (Tue Feb 19 09:25:35 2013)
  - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 20 04:13:07 2013)
    - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 20 04:54:31 2013)
    - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-115) Remove the statement that portable applications should only have one consumer per queue John D. Ament (Wed Feb 20 07:18:43 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Proposed final draft is now submitted Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 20 10:38:09 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JavaOne 2012: What's New in Java Message Service 2.0 - Video now available Nigel Deakin (Fri Feb 22 02:22:15 2013)
[jsr343-experts] (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 25 10:17:22 2013)
- [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting John D. Ament (Mon Feb 25 10:19:47 2013)
  - [jsr343-experts] Re: (JMS_SPEC-86) Chapter 1 "Introduction" is a little dated and requires rewriting Nigel Deakin (Mon Feb 25 11:49:15 2013)
[jsr343-experts] JMS 2.0 Proposed final draft is published Nigel Deakin (Wed Feb 27 05:45:27 2013)