Hi Nigel,
I'll work on a proposal in the next couple of weeks.
Cheers,
Julien.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Nigel Deakin <nigel.deakin_at_oracle.com>wrote:
> On 23/05/2011 10:04, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>
>>
>> State your priorities
>> ---------------------
>>
>> In a separate email, please write a few words about what you'd like to see
>> in JMS 2.0 and post it to the public expert
>> group alias jsr343-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net . I've spoken to several of
>> you directly, asking what your priorities are
>> for changes to the JMS spec. Here is a first opportunity to share your
>> views with other expert group members. If
>> possible, please reply by Friday 3rd June 2011. This list is archived, so
>> latecomers to the EG can read it when they join.
>>
>> NOTE: Please use the subject line "JMS 2.0 Priorities: Proposal from <your
>> name>. Other members can then reply and ask
>> questions to clarify their understanding, without anyone getting confused
>> about whose proposals we are discussing.
>>
>> When we've received proposals from everyone I'll combine them into a
>> single list, and will then start a separate email
>> thread to discuss each.
>>
>
> So far we've received lists of initial priorities from Emran, Reza and
> Masoud. I know one's coming from Tom (my colleague at Oracle). Anybody else?
> If you don't have any particular priorites, and are simply waiting to see
> what others are suggesting, then it would be useful to know that.
>
> I've had an informal chat with seven EG members so far, plus one who hasn't
> joined yet, and gained a useful insight from that. I can work on the basis
> of what you've told me, but if you can write it down and share it with the
> whole group that would be useful.
>
> Just to confirm: I'm trying to establish the agenda at this stage, before
> we plunge into details.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nigel
>
> P.S. Please use plain text email, not HTML.
>
--
Julien Dubois
Twitter: @juliendubois <http://twitter.com/#!/juliendubois>
Phone: +33 (0)6 25 02 34 18