On 23/05/2011 10:04, Nigel Deakin wrote:
>
> State your priorities
> ---------------------
>
> In a separate email, please write a few words about what you'd like to see in JMS 2.0 and post it to the public expert
> group alias jsr343-experts_at_jms-spec.java.net . I've spoken to several of you directly, asking what your priorities are
> for changes to the JMS spec. Here is a first opportunity to share your views with other expert group members. If
> possible, please reply by Friday 3rd June 2011. This list is archived, so latecomers to the EG can read it when they join.
>
> NOTE: Please use the subject line "JMS 2.0 Priorities: Proposal from <your name>. Other members can then reply and ask
> questions to clarify their understanding, without anyone getting confused about whose proposals we are discussing.
>
> When we've received proposals from everyone I'll combine them into a single list, and will then start a separate email
> thread to discuss each.
So far we've received lists of initial priorities from Emran, Reza and Masoud. I know one's coming from Tom (my
colleague at Oracle). Anybody else? If you don't have any particular priorites, and are simply waiting to see what
others are suggesting, then it would be useful to know that.
I've had an informal chat with seven EG members so far, plus one who hasn't joined yet, and gained a useful insight from
that. I can work on the basis of what you've told me, but if you can write it down and share it with the whole group
that would be useful.
Just to confirm: I'm trying to establish the agenda at this stage, before we plunge into details.
Thanks,
Nigel
P.S. Please use plain text email, not HTML.