As somebody who recently switched from RestEasy to Jersey I would disagree.
Though it's not clear why you would need to extensive Jaxrs annotations.
Are there use cases where you have a third party class that you don't have
source for but you want to annotate to expose as a web service?
On Jan 3, 2014 1:38 AM, "cowwoc" <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
> Slightly off-topic, but why do people care so much about JAX-RS
> portability? I get the feeling that users switch JAX-RS providers almost as
> often as they switch databases... which is almost never.
>
> Gili
>
> On 03/01/2014 1:13 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> Inquiring minds would like to know ... why in the world would you want to
> tie yourself so closely to the internal APIs of one particular JAX-RS
> implementation. Indeed, why bother with JAX-RS if you don't like the
> annotations -- that is a key value add for developer productivity.
>
> Craig McClanahan
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Imran Bashir <imran_1981_at_aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> Thank you for your e-mail. Could you please provide me some example that
>> would be great.
>>
>> Sincerely
>> Imran
>> Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill O'Neil <oneil5045_at_gmail.com>
>> To: users <users_at_jersey.java.net>
>> Sent: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 03:35 PM
>> Subject: [Jersey] Re: Jersey without Annotations
>>
>>
>> You can bind Resources programmatically without using annotations.
>> https://jersey.java.net/documentation/latest/user-guide.html#d0e2435
>>
>> If you want to work directly with the Request, Response objects you
>> should be able to do this. It will be a little more trouble to get cookie,
>> header, path, and query parameters. It should be doable though.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Imran Bashir <imran_1981_at_aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>> I wanted to know can I develop a rest web service using Jersey without
>> Annotation.
>> Sincerely
>> Imran
>>
>>
>>
>
>