users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: Jersey without Annotations

From: cowwoc <cowwoc_at_bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:37:12 -0500

Slightly off-topic, but why do people care so much about JAX-RS
portability? I get the feeling that users switch JAX-RS providers almost
as often as they switch databases... which is almost never.

Gili

On 03/01/2014 1:13 AM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Inquiring minds would like to know ... why in the world would you want
> to tie yourself so closely to the internal APIs of one particular
> JAX-RS implementation. Indeed, why bother with JAX-RS if you don't
> like the annotations -- that is a key value add for developer
> productivity.
>
> Craig McClanahan
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Imran Bashir <imran_1981_at_aol.com
> <mailto:imran_1981_at_aol.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Thank you for your e-mail. Could you please provide me some
> example that would be great.
>
> Sincerely
> Imran
> Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill O'Neil <oneil5045_at_gmail.com <mailto:oneil5045_at_gmail.com>>
> To: users <users_at_jersey.java.net <mailto:users_at_jersey.java.net>>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 2, 2014 03:35 PM
> Subject: [Jersey] Re: Jersey without Annotations
>
>
> You can bind Resources programmatically without using annotations.
> https://jersey.java.net/documentation/latest/user-guide.html#d0e2435
>
> If you want to work directly with the Request, Response objects
> you should be able to do this. It will be a little more trouble
> to get cookie, header, path, and query parameters. It should be
> doable though.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Imran Bashir <imran_1981_at_aol.com
> <mailto:imran_1981_at_aol.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
> I wanted to know can I develop a rest web service using Jersey
> without Annotation.
> Sincerely
> Imran
>
>
>