Also, what is the correct syntax for including code fragments in posts
made via email client (as opposed to a forum)? Without any special sytax
it appears the formatting gets messed up.
On 11/07/2011 09:18 AM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have an XML Schema as follows:
>
> <complexType name="RegistryRequestType">
> ...
> </complexType>
>
> <element name="RemoveObjectsRequest">
> <complexType>
> <complexContent>
> <extension base="rs:RegistryRequestType">
> ....
> </extension>
> </complexContent>
> </complexType>
>
> I use JAXB to generate bindings for above schema as follows:
>
> public class RegistryRequestType {
> ...
> }
>
> public class RemoveObjectsRequest extends RegistryRequestType {
> ...
> }
>
> I have a jersey server resource method as follows:
>
> @PUT
> @Consumes({"application/xml"})
> @Produces({"application/xml"})
> @Path("/requests")
> public Response putRequest(RegistryRequestType req) {
> }
>
> I issue a client PUT request where entity is a RemoveObjectsRequest
> element using following code:
>
> RemoveObjectsRequest removeRequest = ...
> ClientResponse resp = webResource.accept(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML).
> type(MediaType.APPLICATION_XML).
> entity(BindingUtility.marshalObject(removeRequest)).
> //marshalls RemoveObjectsRequest object to String
> put(ClientResponse.class);
>
> When my putRequest() resource method is called, I expect the req param
> to be set to an object of type RemoveObjectsRequest. Instead it is set
> to a an object where the type is RegistryRequestType and data members
> of the RemoveObjectsRequest are not set.
>
> Is this a issue in jersey (note I am using 1.10) or do I have faulty
> assumption on what to expect?
>
> If the expected behavior is not possible then what is the way to get
> the raw entity from the request within my resource method so I can
> unmarshall it as needed.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
--
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi
Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com