Hi Ed,
You can use both approaches. All you need is to implement your own message
body writer (in both cases). That one could delegate to existing JSON/JSONP
providers, so no need to do all the work again. I can provide more
details as requested.
I am just curious what is your use case? Why do you need a special
class? Maybe
we can accommodate Jersey JSON providers to suit your needs better.
Thanks,
~Jakub
On 21.11.2011 2:29, Ed Anuff wrote:
> Is it possible to produce JsonP without having to resort to using the
> JSONWithPadding wrapper? Conversely, is it possible to subclass
> JSONWithPadding rather than using it as a wrapper?
>
> Ed
>