Sure thing Jakub,
Will wait for your review.
Have a nice time at J1 - I envy you - at least I can read some news from
Twitter :-)
Cheers!
2011/10/4 Jakub Podlesak <jakub.podlesak_at_oracle.com>
> **
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> I apologize for delayed response. Attending J1 this week.
> Will try to have a look and get back to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Jakub
>
>
> On 29.9.2011 15:34, Palli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attached the patch to the JIRA:
> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-777
> It adds the support for sending InputStream as a multipart/form-data body
> part entity, which I think is more adequate and still can be used for byte[]
> with ByteArrayInputStream.
>
> Can anyone take a look if it's acceptable?
>
> Cheers!
> Pedro
>
> On 09/21/2011 07:41 PM, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
>
> Thanks. Looking forward to your contribution.
> Please keep the list posted if you have any question.
>
> ~Jakub
>
> On 21.9.2011 18:09, Palli wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Great, there is a JIRA for this enhancement:
> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-777
>
> As soon as I'll be able I'll take a look at it, as I'm quite fancy getting
> known Jersey :-)
>
> Cheers!
>
> Pedro
>
> On 09/21/2011 02:46 PM, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
> +1 for the 2. option.
>
> And yes, contributions are warmly welcome.
> Please file a RFE, and attach a patch there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~Jakub
>
> On 21.9.2011 12:05, pallipp_at_gmail.com wrote:
>
> Howdy!
>
> I think it would be nice if we could have an additional support for
> byte[] instead of just flat File objects in FormDataBodyPart. I think
> there are situations in which we don't need to hit the disk before
> sending the data through the wire (or do we?)
>
> According to the javadoc [1] there is only a File object support.
>
> If you agree that such feature is acceptable, than I think that either:
> 1. The FileDataBodyPart should be adjusted to support byte[] or,
> 2. Another subclass of FormDataBodyPart should be created which will
> support the byte[].
>
> Personally, I'd prefer the 2. option.
>
> What do you think about that?
> Are you open for contributions?
>
> The idea for this feature was born in Arquillian project [2].
>
> Cheers!
>
> Pedro
>
> [1] -
> http://jersey.java.net/nonav/apidocs/1.9.1/contribs/jersey-multipart/co
> m/sun/jersey/multipart/file/FileDataBodyPart.html
> [2] - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-569
>
>
>
>
>