Hi Pedro,
Thanks for the patch!
I apologize for delayed response. Attending J1 this week.
Will try to have a look and get back to you.
Thanks,
~Jakub
On 29.9.2011 15:34, Palli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've attached the patch to the JIRA:
> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-777
> It adds the support for sending InputStream as a multipart/form-data
> body part entity, which I think is more adequate and still can be used
> for byte[] with ByteArrayInputStream.
>
> Can anyone take a look if it's acceptable?
>
> Cheers!
> Pedro
>
> On 09/21/2011 07:41 PM, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
>> Thanks. Looking forward to your contribution.
>> Please keep the list posted if you have any question.
>>
>> ~Jakub
>>
>> On 21.9.2011 18:09, Palli wrote:
>>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> Great, there is a JIRA for this enhancement:
>>> http://java.net/jira/browse/JERSEY-777
>>>
>>> As soon as I'll be able I'll take a look at it, as I'm quite fancy
>>> getting known Jersey :-)
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> Pedro
>>>
>>> On 09/21/2011 02:46 PM, Jakub Podlesak wrote:
>>>> Hi Pedro,
>>>>
>>>> +1 for the 2. option.
>>>>
>>>> And yes, contributions are warmly welcome.
>>>> Please file a RFE, and attach a patch there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> ~Jakub
>>>>
>>>> On 21.9.2011 12:05, pallipp_at_gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> Howdy!
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be nice if we could have an additional support for
>>>>> byte[] instead of just flat File objects in FormDataBodyPart. I think
>>>>> there are situations in which we don't need to hit the disk before
>>>>> sending the data through the wire (or do we?)
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the javadoc [1] there is only a File object support.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you agree that such feature is acceptable, than I think that
>>>>> either:
>>>>> 1. The FileDataBodyPart should be adjusted to support byte[] or,
>>>>> 2. Another subclass of FormDataBodyPart should be created which will
>>>>> support the byte[].
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I'd prefer the 2. option.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about that?
>>>>> Are you open for contributions?
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea for this feature was born in Arquillian project [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>
>>>>> Pedro
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] -
>>>>> http://jersey.java.net/nonav/apidocs/1.9.1/contribs/jersey-multipart/co
>>>>>
>>>>> m/sun/jersey/multipart/file/FileDataBodyPart.html
>>>>> [2] - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-569
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>