users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?

From: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:13:45 +0100

+1 for git

Here is the w3c reasoning for choosing hg:

http://www.w3.org/blog/systeam/2010/06/16/why_we_chose_mercurial_as_our_dvcs/

cam

On 11/04/2011, at 8:57 PM, Arul Dhesiaseelan wrote:

> +1 for Mercurial as it is very easy to get going than Git. I have used both Git and Mercurial and prefer the later for its super simplicity. Here is a decent analysis for Git vs Hg (http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis) for its technical merits.
>
> -Arul
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Stewart <rds6235_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> git
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com> wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> For Jersey 2.x we are considering to switch our VCS from SVN into Git or Mercurial. Sticking to SVN is still an option
> too. FWIW, here's my take on the topic:
>
>
>
>
>