users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?

From: Arul Dhesiaseelan <aruld_at_acm.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:57:24 -0600

+1 for Mercurial as it is very easy to get going than Git. I have used both
Git and Mercurial and prefer the later for its super simplicity. Here is a
decent analysis for Git vs Hg (
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis) for its technical
merits.

-Arul

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Stewart <rds6235_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> git
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> For Jersey 2.x we are considering to switch our VCS from SVN into Git or
>> Mercurial. Sticking to SVN is still an option
>> too. FWIW, here's my take on the topic:
>>
>>
>