users@jersey.java.net

[Jersey] Re: SVN, GIT or MERCURIAL for Jersey 2.0?

From: Tauren Mills <tauren_at_groovee.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:18:48 -0700

Absolutely and positively a +1 Git vote from me!

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Arul Dhesiaseelan <aruld_at_acm.org> wrote:

> +1 for Mercurial as it is very easy to get going than Git. I have used both
> Git and Mercurial and prefer the later for its super simplicity. Here is a
> decent analysis for Git vs Hg (
> http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis) for its technical
> merits.
>
> -Arul
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Stewart <rds6235_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> git
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Marek Potociar <
>> marek.potociar_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Folks,
>>>
>>> For Jersey 2.x we are considering to switch our VCS from SVN into Git or
>>> Mercurial. Sticking to SVN is still an option
>>> too. FWIW, here's my take on the topic:
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>