On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Markus Karg wrote:
> It would have been more fair to tell Mr Fielding the whole story:
>
I thought I asked the question in a fair and non-predudicial way. I think the terms "RPC-style", "fancy HTTP header" etc are quite the opposite.
Marc.
> We have a discussion about HATEOAS and one programmer has the idea to switch
> state by sending links encoded as fancy http headers or RPC-style
> entity-free pure-action URIs, while the other programmer says that according
> to your dissertation and blog entries HATEOAS enforces that state-switching
> links must be part of the received document but never there may be neither
> RPC-style entity-free pure-action URI nor links sent in fancy http headers
> due to incompatibility and protocol dependency.
>
> Just as a backgrounder so you understand what the question is targeting in.
>
> Regards
> Markus
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley_at_Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Montag, 15. Februar 2010 21:52
>> To: Roy T. Fielding
>> Cc: users_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>> Subject: [Jersey] Hypermedia clarification
>>
>> Roy,
>>
>> I'm hoping you could clear up a point in a discussion we're having on
>> the Jersey users list.
>>
>> When the REST architectural style is mapped to HTTP, do the terms
>> hypermedia and hypertext encompass:
>>
>> (i) HTTP headers and the entity body
>> (ii) Just the entity body
>> (iii) Something else (please explain)
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Marc.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>