On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:12 +0100, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 10:08 +0100, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am not hugely informed on this matter, but i suspect it may be
> >> better to keep closer to the JavaDoc if the common case is that one
> >> will want to use JavaDoc + the tags. Is that the most likely
> >> scenario?
> > For me this is the case: most important information comes from class,
> > method and param docs.
> >
>
> If Java annotations, for what were JavaDoc tags, were available would
> it still be likely that a developer would want to augment with JavaDoc?
>
> If so then i am not sure there is any ease of use advantage to using
> Java annotations, which IIUC is the main reason to utilize Java
> annotations. It makes it much easier to generate the WADL, whereas
> with JavaDoc the process is much more involved.
Ok, if there are no other opinions we should continue using javadoc for
now.
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Paul.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net