On Feb 3, 2009, at 3:03 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> This should be finished:
> - added the new wadl-resourcedoc-doclet and moved the
> ResourceDoclet from the maven-wadl-plugin to wadl-resourcedoc-doclet
> - added the new wadl-resourcedoc-doclet artifact as module to the
> contribs/pom.xml
> - updated the generate-wadl and extended-wadl-webapp samples to use
> the
> new artifact (instead of maven-wadl-plugin) for generating the
> resourcedoc
> - updated the wiki to reflect the changes ([1]).
> - added an entry to changes.txt
>
> So users of the latest SNAPSHOT (which use extended wadl via the
> ResourceDoclet) now should change the docletArtifact/artifactId of the
> maven-javadoc-plugin configuration from maven-wadl-plugin to
> wadl-resourcedoc-doclet (see [1])!
>
Thanks!
Note that you broke the build, we need to build using SE 5. So i had
to add dependencies to teh SE 5 profile. I dunno why this is not
required for SE 6.
Paul.
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
> [1] http://wikis.sun.com/display/Jersey/HowToConfigureExtendedWADL#HowToConfigureExtendedWADL-Configurethemavenjavadocplugintocreatetheresourcedoc.xml
>
>
> On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 10:46 +0100, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the ResourceDoclet is part of the maven-wadl-plugin as I
>>> introduced it
>>> (the ResourceDoclet) together with this plugin. The initial
>>> purpose of
>>> the plugin was to create an extended wadl (wadl enriched with
>>> javadoc),
>>> and to be able to create wadl at build time. During the development,
>>> more and more things related to the extended wadl were moved from
>>> the
>>> maven-wadl-plugin to the main jersey artifacts, so that finally the
>>> responsibility of the maven-wadl-plugin was only for creating the
>>> (extended) wadl at build time from maven.
>>>
>>> To get things completely clean the ResourceDoclet should be
>>> extracted as
>>> a separate artifact (e.g. com.sun.jersey.contribs.wadl-resource-
>>> doclet),
>>> as this is not related to maven at all. The fqn of the
>>> ResourceDoclet
>>> would not need to be changed, therefore existing configurations
>>> using
>>> the ResourceDoclet would only have to declare another dependency
>>> (respectively use another jar-file).
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
>>
>> No objections.
>>
>> If you want this to be part of the 1.0.2 then it needs to be done
>> within the next three days as i would prefer to freeze features by
>> COB
>> Wednesday,
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>
> --
> Martin Grotzke
> http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/