I posted issue
https://jersey.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=122
Gili
Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> Hi Gili,
>
> Currently it is not possible without duplicating all the functionality
> in the current servlet. I have been meaning to look at this but never
> found the time. In general only having Jersey servlet support as a
> filter is probably the right solution. So perhaps we should change
> this for 1.0.1? could you log an issue to track this?
>
> I am not sure how to make things work as of now, perhaps it is
> possible to have a servlet filter that forwards to wicket or the
> Jersey servlet?
>
> Paul.
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Gili wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to mix Jersey with Apache Wicket so that any HTTP GET/POST
>> requests
>> against HTML would get handled by Wicket and all others by Jersey.
>> Wicket
>> already uses a Filter which ignores any URLs it can't handle but
>> Jersey
>> still uses a servlet. Is it possible to create a Filter for Jersey? Or
>> perhaps you have another idea on how to mix the two technologies?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Gili
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/Using-a-Filter-instead-of-a-Servlet-for-Jersey--tp1307406p1307406.html
>> Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Using-a-Filter-instead-of-a-Servlet-for-Jersey--tp1307406p1314894.html
Sent from the Jersey mailing list archive at Nabble.com.