On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Arun Gupta wrote:
> >I'm definitely waiting for better JSON support from Jersey. We also need
> >to make sure that the generated JSON is jMaki friendly as well.
> >
>
> Yes, i defer to Jakub on the exact details of this :-)
The idea is to have json support integrated directly
into jaxb, which is what i am working on nowadays.
And yes, i am trying to make it jMaki friendly
by supporting jMaki data models [1] or at least
making it easy to generate them.
I have already tested some (non-jaxb-integrated) prototype
code in [json-improvements] branch, which works fine with
jMaki and need to integrate it to the jaxb.
The integration is not that trivial, but
i hope to have some results soon.
~Jakub
[1]
http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Projects/jMakiDataModels
>
> Paul.
>
> >-Arun
> >
> >Paul Sandoz wrote:
> >>Arun Gupta wrote:
> >>>Now available at:
> >>>
> >>>http://blogs.sun.com/arungupta/entry/screencast_web11_travel_map_another
> >>>
> >>
> >>Nice. I agree with you with about using e4x for processing XML.
> >>
> >>Hopefully, when we have better JSON integrated into JAXB support you
> >>will be able to use consumer friendly JSON or XML as you wish.
> >>
> >>Paul.
> >>
> >
>
> --
> | ? + ? = To question
> ----------------\
> Paul Sandoz
> x38109
> +33-4-76188109
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_jersey.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_jersey.dev.java.net
>
--
Jakub Podlesak
http://blogs.sun.com/japod