No problem. I hope the vacation was good.
some of these things might be in there already, but here's the list
(in maven dependency format):
<!-- start jwsdp 1.6 dependencies -->
<!-- fastinfoset -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jvnet.fastinfoset</groupId>
<artifactId>fast-infoset</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- jaxb -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-xjc</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.bind</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb-libs</artifactId>
<version>1.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<!-- jaxp -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.parsers</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxp-api</artifactId>
<version>1.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.w3c.dom</groupId>
<artifactId>dom-api</artifactId>
<version>3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.xml.sax</groupId>
<artifactId>sax-api</artifactId>
<version>2.0.1</version>
</dependency>
<!-- jaxr -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.registry</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxr-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.registry</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxr-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.0.8</version>
</dependency>
<!-- jaxrpc -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.rpc</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxrpc-api</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.rpc</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxrpc-impl</artifactId>
<version>1.1.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.xml.rpc</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxrpc-spi</artifactId>
<version>1.1.2</version>
</dependency>
<!-- commons -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.activation</groupId>
<artifactId>activation</artifactId>
<version>1.0.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.namespace</groupId>
<artifactId>jax-qname</artifactId>
<version>1.1</version>
</dependency>
<!-- skipped jta because it's in the jdk -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.mail</groupId>
<artifactId>mail</artifactId>
<version>1.3.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.relaxng.datatype</groupId>
<artifactId>relaxng-datatype</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<!-- guess -->
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.namespace</groupId>
<artifactId>namespace</artifactId>
<version>1.0.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.org.apache.internal.security</groupId>
<artifactId>xmlsec</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<!-- guess -->
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.msv.datatype.xsd</groupId>
<artifactId>xsdlib</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<!-- guess -->
</dependency>
<!-- stax -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.stream</groupId>
<artifactId>stax-api</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- xmldsig -->
<dependency>
<groupId>javax.xml.crypto.dsig</groupId>
<artifactId>xmldsig</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- skipped jcert because it's in the jdk -->
<!-- skipped jnet because it's in the jdk -->
<!-- skipped jsse because it's in the jdk -->
<!-- end jwsdp 1.6 dependencies -->
On 12/6/06, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_sun.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for a delay in response. I've been taking vacation. I know you
> sent me a private e-mail on this.
>
> Gregory Kick wrote:
> > Does anybody know the specifics on the licensing terms for JWSDP? I
> > was wondering whether or not it'd be possible to put the
> > "redistributable components" into the maven2-repository_at_d.j.n
> > (complete with dependency information and the correct groupIds).
> >
> > Until recently I had largely ignored all of this, but being forced
> > back into java 1.4 has made it more of an issue. If any of you Sun
> > guys know the legal stuff, a little insight would be appreciated. If
> > it doesn't work out, I'd be glad to put the poms in there with the
> > download link anyway.
>
> Which components are you refering to? JWSDP has a different licensing
> terms for each of its component, so I can't make a blanket statement
> about whether it's OK or not.
>
> We have to work through them one by one.
>
> --
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com
>
>
>
--
Gregory Kick
gk5885_at_gmail.com