The article A talks about what kind of schemas typically yield a simpler
JAXB generated classes.
The article B talks about good practices that I advocate when you design
schemas. But it doesn't necessarily yield a simpler JAXB generated
classes. And it might be worth noting that the article predates JAXB.
Personally, and not everyone agrees with this, but I think it's
unfortunate that JAXB 1.0 can't produce a better binding for schemas
that follow my DOs and DON'Ts, but in 2.0, the handling of anonymous
complex types will be improved.
regards,
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jaxb.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jaxb.dev.java.net