Arun Gupta wrote:
> With TExtensionHandler checked into workspace, WSDLParserExtension is
> moot. Is that correct ?
No. The former is for tools, the latter is for runtime. They are used
for different things.
> Also, can we rename TExtensionHandler to TWSDLParserExtensionHandler to
> be more meaningful ?
I kinda like a shorter prefix. T works just fine for me. But I don't
feel strongly.
> Can we also rename JavaExtensionHandler to TJavaExtensionHandler to be
> consistent ?
Ah, that's why it makes sense to call it TWSDLExtensionHandler!
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com