This is not a good idea. It can be problematic as future changes in the
apis wont be easiliy detectable by the superclasses resulting in to bugs
thats hard to fix.
Moreover it doesn't provide much to the implementor of this class,
current IDEs can automatically generate the default implementations of
these methods - I guess thats pretty much the NOOP implementation do.
IMO, we should have this class as interface if not then we should not
keep the default implementations in it.
-vivek.
Doug Kohlert wrote:
> At the request of a potential implementor of this extension, I made it
> an abstract class rather than an interface.
>
> Doug Kohlert wrote:
>
>> I removed all uses of CheckedException from from the
>> WSDLGeneratorExtension api as it appears that
>> no component from the wsinterop project needs access to it.
>>
>
--
Vivek Pandey
Web Services Standards and Technologies
Sun Microsystems Inc.