users@jax-rs-spec.java.net
[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] OPTIONS Response: HTTP Allow only ?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Sergey Beryozkin <
sberyozkin_at_talend.com
>
Date
: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:57 +0100
Hi
According to [1], response to OPTIONS 'SHOULD' also provide a body
(albeit) in the unspecified format, as opposed to setting a well-known
HTTP Allow header.
Are implementations expected to provide a body, in addition to HTTP
Allow header ?
Thanks, Sergey
[1]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22#section-4.3.7
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Julian Reschke: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: OPTIONS Response: HTTP Allow only ?"
Previous message
:
Bill Burke: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] _at_Default and _at_PathParam?"
Next in thread
:
Julian Reschke: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: OPTIONS Response: HTTP Allow only ?"
Reply
:
Julian Reschke: "[jax-rs-spec users] [jsr339-experts] Re: OPTIONS Response: HTTP Allow only ?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]