On 13/08/14 16:20, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi Marek
>
> Thanks for doing the announcement and the clarifications.
>
> I've created quite a few JIRAs recently and some of them are to do with
> providing the clarifications at the spec text or JavaDocs level, we have
> users opening issues around some grey areas in the spec/doc texts.
> And I'm not very careful about adding the code that may not guarantee
And I'm *now* very careful
Single character typo changes the meaning dramatically :-)
> the portability around the way the standard JAX-RS code is being treated
> :-).
>
> I marked them for 2.1 but thought may be I should review them and
> re-mark for 2.0.1.
>
> It's not a major problem though, you are right, no reason to be terribly
> sad about it :-)
>
> I'll check some of those issues and list them here - I won't insist for
> then to make it to 2.0.2, if 2.1 work will start soon enough then would
> be good enough for me to address them as part of 2.1
>
>
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
> On 13/08/14 15:27, Marek Potociar wrote:
>> I forgot to add:
>>
>> The 2.0.1 release has been delivered based on a community request. If
>> you believe that there are more bugs that should be delivered as part of
>> JAX-RS 2.0 bug-fix release, please bring them forward and we can discuss
>> the feasibility of fixing those issues in a JAX-RS 2.0 bug-fix release
>> and then decide to release 2.0.2, if necessary.
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> On 13 Aug 2014, at 16:22, Marek Potociar <marek.potociar_at_oracle.com
>> <mailto:marek.potociar_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>
>>> I was hoping to postpone the release announcement a little bit until
>>> all the tasks are complete (JCP JSR-339 page update, updated RI
>>> released), but your email made me send an early announcement - see my
>>> previous email.
>>>
>>> Now to your question about review: a bug-fix spec release is primarily
>>> a maintenance job that is done by spec lead(s), there is not much room
>>> for EG involvement. Santiago and me went through all the bugs (only
>>> bugs can be addressed in a bug-fix release) and selected all that
>>> could be fixed without breaking TCK (esp. signature tests). You can
>>> find all the resolved issues here
>>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-480?jql=project%20=%20JAX_RS_SPEC%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%202.0.1%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC,%20priority%20DESC,%20created%20ASC>.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There's no need to be disappointed, it was a rather mundane task, in
>>> fact :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Marek
>>>
>>> On 12 Aug 2014, at 17:27, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin_at_talend.com
>>> <mailto:sberyozkin_at_talend.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I've spotted that 2.0.1 has been published to Central.
>>>>
>>>> Was it supposed to be at least mentioned on this list ?
>>>> I saw Marek marking a couple of issues for 2.0.1, and I was planning
>>>> to review all the issues I've opened recently and marked for 2.1.0
>>>> and see if some of them might be addressed for 2.0.1
>>>>
>>>> A bit disappointed
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Sergey
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|javax.ws.rs|javax.ws.rs-api|2.0.1|jar
>>>>
>>>
>>
>