You can't say that you passed the preliminary TCK.
Honestly, if the Oracle Java EE licensee gestapo secret police doesn't
do a SMACK DOWN of this CXF statement, I'll be really really pissed off.
They have given us so much grief over the years it is only fair they
do the same to you :)
On 7/28/2014 2:28 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> This is a CXF statement:
>
> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs.html#JAX-RS-2.0Final
>
>
> Sergey
> On 28/07/14 20:07, Markus KARG wrote:
>> Experts,
>>
>> in preparation for the next lecture on JAX-RS I'm giving at JUG
>> Stuttgart, I'd like to prepare for another question I heard at JUG
>> Karlsruhe: How good is support for JAX-RS currently?
>>
>> In particular, people liked to know which products implement JAX-RS 2.0
>> already and have passed the TCK.
>>
>> So I'd be happy if the vendors among us could post a link to their
>> particular open source product page where it is indicated that their
>> product can be downloaded and is JAX-RS 2.0 compliant.
>>
>> I tried to find the information on my own, but for example with CXF the
>> web site says it is JSR 311 / JAX-RS 1.0 compliant only. And I couldn't
>> find any information about IBM and OW2 poduct status regarding JAX-RS
>> 2.0, while TomEE+ apparently seems to have JAX-RS 1.0 only… (after more
>> than one year since JAX-RS 2.0)?!
>>
>> I will include all the links arriving in-time on a slide, so this is
>> usefuly for the products' popularity, too.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Markus
>>
>
>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com