On 14/12/11 17:02, Bill Burke wrote:
> On 12/14/11 8:23 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>> I'm sorry for putting you in a shock, but I still don't understand the
>> issue. No one is forcing developers to create
>> configuration instances by themselves. Can you provide a concrete
>> example of the problem you see?
>>
>
> Ok, you didn't intend for the interface to be implemented and used by
> users. That helps a bit. My only remaining concern is that somebody will
> try to use it as such.
>
All the interfaces in JAX-RS 1.1 can be either directly implemented or
used to get something done by users; I'm worried about JAX-RS 2.0
getting a bunch of public interfaces in which can neither directly
implemented or used by users
Sergey