jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net
[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen <
Santiago.PericasGeertsen_at_oracle.com
>
Date
: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:47:15 -0400
On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
> Client Accept header should always take precedence over any server side qualifiers. Not sure if the algorithm covers that or not.
Yes, it does. Step 7 in Section 3.8 [1] sorts media types using q (client) as secondary key and qs (server) as tertiary key.
-- Santiago
[1]
http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/sources/git/content/spec/spec.pdf?rev=8691007a040ed946afe0d6549186376798c73264
>
> On 9/6/11 12:26 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>> Hello experts,
>> please review the proposal available on our project wiki and send your feedback:
>>
>>
http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/pages/ServerSideConNeg
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Marek
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Marek Potociar: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Previous message
:
Sergey Beryozkin: "[jsr339-experts] Re: Removing command pattern simplifies things"
In reply to
:
Bill Burke: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Next in thread
:
Sergey Beryozkin: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Reply
:
Sergey Beryozkin: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]