jsr339-experts@jax-rs-spec.java.net
[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Bill Burke <
bburke_at_redhat.com
>
Date
: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:23:27 -0400
Client Accept header should always take precedence over any server side
qualifiers. Not sure if the algorithm covers that or not.
On 9/6/11 12:26 PM, Marek Potociar wrote:
> Hello experts,
> please review the proposal available on our project wiki and send your feedback:
>
>
http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/pages/ServerSideConNeg
>
> Thank you,
> Marek
-- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Sergey Beryozkin: "[jsr339-experts] Re: Removing command pattern simplifies things"
Previous message
:
Marek Potociar: "[jsr339-experts] Re: Target: two new properties"
In reply to
:
Marek Potociar: "[jsr339-experts] HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Next in thread
:
Santiago Pericas-Geertsen: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Reply
:
Santiago Pericas-Geertsen: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Reply
:
Marek Potociar: "[jsr339-experts] Re: HEADS-UP: Server side content negotiation proposal"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]