Hi Marek
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On 07/15/2011 11:30 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> Now, what I'd like to propose is to have an over-arching requirement: all the current and next proposals have to pass a
>> litmus test:
>>
>> - Is satisfying a given requirement with a given proposal going to help users write *practical*, *real-world* code which
>> will be realistically used. If it's going to be of academic interests then it has to be dropped. Otherwise API will be
>> 'diluted'.
>>
>> Well, I guess, it's tricky to envisage all the real-world cases users will want to address with this API. But we should
>> be realistic IMHO
>
> What is your suggestion on how to measure or evaluate proposals against this requirement?
>
I'm not sure - our collective experience will tell us if it's going to
be realistic or not :-)
thanks, Sergey
> Marek