Thanks, I understand the idea and how pieces fit together and such. I'd
like to see if I can propose dropping a Link abstraction or at least it
acting as a Client idea, without attempting a 'revolution' (as per
Marek's advice :-)) and I need to see what the simpler version would
miss without a Link
But I'll just propose something and will ask what it misses
Cheers, Sergey
Santiago Pericas-Geertsen wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Marek Potociar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> if you are looking for the Client API wiki page, here's the link:
>> http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/pages/Low-levelClientAPI
>
> Chapter 5 in the draft spec [1] also explains the basic concepts.
>
> -- Santiago
>
> [1] http://java.net/projects/jax-rs-spec/sources/git/content/spec/spec.pdf?rev=0e76a20b0c2d8baf3f8ef13afa4e4ff102dbc64f
>
>> On 06/29/2011 02:53 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I was wondering, would it make sense to create a very basic table/wiki page which attempt to capture how various Client
>>> API pieces work together in addressing various scenarios to do with with the initialization, configuration and mainly
>>> with consuming HTTP services.
>>>
>>> Marek, Santiago - would it make sense ? It would definitely help me be more constructive in my feedback and perhaps it
>>> can be of help to all of us ?
>>> Many thanks, Sergey
>>>
>