http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-71 -> hopefully clear enough.
On 05.04.2011, at 18:51, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
> Yes, please file an issue. It's better if the issue is specific, e.g. instead of "convention over configuration" it's about "defaulting annotation values from program element names" or something like that.
>
> I'm OK with it being classified as "major".
>
> On 4/5/11 5:34 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
>> It goes that direction - should I file an issue first?
>>
>> I would like to apply the idea of Convention over Configuration on as many levels, as only possible.
>>
>>
>> On 04.04.2011, at 23:09, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/4/11 1:33 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
>>>> We should start with something "simple". Client API would be the most fun to start with.
>>>>
>>>> @Roberto I miss the "Improvement of Convention over Configuration / Configuration (Annotation) by Exception". I would prioritize it as MAJOR.
>>> Which issue is that? JAX_RS_SPEC-59 [1]?
>>>
>>> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-59
>>>
>> Consultant, Author, Speaker, Java Champion
>>
>> Weblog: blog.adam-bien.com
>> press: press.adam-bien.com
>> eMail: abien_at_adam-bien.com
>> twitter: twitter.com/adambien
>> Mobile: 0049(0)170 280 3144
>>
>> Author: 7 (Java SE/EE, SOA) Books, about 100 articles
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>