Perfect, thanks.
On 4/7/11 9:08 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
> http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-71 -> hopefully clear enough.
> On 05.04.2011, at 18:51, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
>
>> Yes, please file an issue. It's better if the issue is specific, e.g. instead of "convention over configuration" it's about "defaulting annotation values from program element names" or something like that.
>>
>> I'm OK with it being classified as "major".
>>
>> On 4/5/11 5:34 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
>>> It goes that direction - should I file an issue first?
>>>
>>> I would like to apply the idea of Convention over Configuration on as many levels, as only possible.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04.04.2011, at 23:09, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/4/11 1:33 AM, Adam Bien wrote:
>>>>> We should start with something "simple". Client API would be the most fun to start with.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Roberto I miss the "Improvement of Convention over Configuration / Configuration (Annotation) by Exception". I would prioritize it as MAJOR.
>>>> Which issue is that? JAX_RS_SPEC-59 [1]?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/JAX_RS_SPEC-59
>>>>
>>> Consultant, Author, Speaker, Java Champion
>>>
>>> Weblog: blog.adam-bien.com
>>> press: press.adam-bien.com
>>> eMail: abien_at_adam-bien.com
>>> twitter: twitter.com/adambien
>>> Mobile: 0049(0)170 280 3144
>>>
>>> Author: 7 (Java SE/EE, SOA) Books, about 100 articles
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>