Ryan LeCompte wrote:
> Alessio,
>
> Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. It looks like the only
> solution is to create a new complex type that has all of the "parameters"
> that I need. Then the operation just takes a single argument of that type
> with all of the values that I would otherwise have as separate parameters to
> the method.
yes, otherwise you could use the RPC style (instead of the document one).