Well, we like ours :-).
More seriously, we know our implementation better than Axis, but...
The RI implements JAX-RPC 1.1 as FCS (happened a few releases ago) and
conforms to WS-I BP 1.1 with attachments as FCS in JWSDP 1.4. JWSDP 1.4
also has an EA implementation of the WS-I Security profile. As far as I
can tell from ws.apache.org/axis, Axis 1.2 implements JAX-RPC 1.1 as a
beta. The last time I looked at performance benchmarks, the RI was
comfortably better.
But we are biased, so we would love to hear other experiences.
Time-wise, Axis followed on Apache SOAP which was out there before there
was any JAX-RPC spec and thus ahead of our RI implementation. The Axis
group was a member of the JAX-RPC EG and their implementation passed the
JAX-RPC TCK some (short?) time after the first JAX-RPC (1.0) Spec went out.
- eduard/o
>>>>>>>
Subject: RE: WSDP 1.4 JAX_RPC RI vs Apache Axis 1.1/1.2?
From: Alex <alex_at_squigly.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
To: <users_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net>
so which one is better?:)
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:54:01 +0200
>> From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne_at_manes.net>
>> Reply-To: users_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
>> To: users_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
>> Subject: RE: WSDP 1.4 JAX_RPC RI vs Apache Axis 1.1/1.2?
>>
>> Apache Axis is a completely different implementation from Sun's
JAX-RPC RI.
>> They both implement the JAX-RPC API, but they have completely
different code
>> bases. (They were developed concurrently.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_jax-rpc.dev.java.net