dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

Re: spec question... on mentioning a new XML element...

From: Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:15:13 -0500

I think you can get there directly:
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/
And yes, ther are functional categories set up.

-roger
Jim Driscoll wrote:
> I still can't log in to Java.net to check, so I don't know what
> subcategories Ed's set up - but if you have a concern about the spec,
> I think that the spec alias is probably the best place to bug folks.
> You can post there now, right? (If not, then I'll have to bug Ed to
> fix that finally.)
>
> From what I remember of the categories, they were arranged
> functionally - which means that any concern about something missing
> (such as spec mentions of partial-view-context) should go in their
> functional areas - in this case, maybe Ajax).
>
> Jim
>
> On 12/17/09 1:29 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=705
>>
>>
>> interesting, that there is no "spec document" component :-)
>> bug deal only with code ?! :-)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Matthias
>> Wessendorf<matzew_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> Q: should the spec mention the introduction of new XML elements, such
>>> as partial-view-context-factory (under factroy/ node) ?
>>> Or is it sufficient to just mention it in the not (easily) readable
>>> XML schema section of the spec ... ?
>>> (I guess most folks ignore that part ... :-) )
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
>