I still can't log in to Java.net to check, so I don't know what
subcategories Ed's set up - but if you have a concern about the spec, I
think that the spec alias is probably the best place to bug folks. You
can post there now, right? (If not, then I'll have to bug Ed to fix
that finally.)
From what I remember of the categories, they were arranged functionally
- which means that any concern about something missing (such as spec
mentions of partial-view-context) should go in their functional areas -
in this case, maybe Ajax).
Jim
On 12/17/09 1:29 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=705
>
> interesting, that there is no "spec document" component :-)
> bug deal only with code ?! :-)
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<matzew_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> Q: should the spec mention the introduction of new XML elements, such
>> as partial-view-context-factory (under factroy/ node) ?
>> Or is it sufficient to just mention it in the not (easily) readable
>> XML schema section of the spec ... ?
>> (I guess most folks ignore that part ... :-) )
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>