users@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: Re: Report Issues of JSF 2.3 Public Review

From: Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:33:22 +0100

Ed, how should I deal with the now indeed unnecessary port property in
UIWebsocket class? Spec or impl issue? It has indeed already been removed
from vdldoc, but just overlooked in UIWebsocket.

Cheers, B

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I created https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4223 for jsf.push
> script matter.
>
> As to context params, those are defined in PushContext.
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Looking for more issues, according to the javadoc of the public review, I
>> found UIWebsocket has "port" property. It should be removed, because the
>> URL is customized in ViewHandler. The spec documentation and the vdldoc is
>> ok, so the only place we need to fix is UIWebsocket. I can't find where
>> these two constants:
>>
>> javax.faces.ENABLE_WEBSOCKET_ENDPOINT
>> javax.faces.WEBSOCKET_ENDPOINT_PORT
>>
>> I was expecting them in ViewHandler.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>>
>> 2017-02-01 16:11 GMT-05:00 Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>:
>>
>>> >>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:24:13 +0100, Bauke Scholtz <
>>> balusc_at_gmail.com> said:
>>>
>>> EB> I suspect Bauke did that for a reason, but I would like to ask him to
>>> EB> make it be the same as Ajax, if possible. Bauke?
>>>
>>> B> Not a technical reason really. It was just a coding style which
>>> B> advocates encapsulation. It's possible to revert it to global
>>> B> style. I only wonder if I should create a spec or impl issue on this.
>>>
>>> Please create an impl issue and do the work in the MOJARRA_2_3X_ROLLING
>>> branch. Once it is safely integrated, please use git apply <patch> to
>>> apply it to master.
>>>
>>> >> Bauke, can we remove this? I can factually state it is not used
>>> anywhere.
>>>
>>> B> Indeed, it was a leftover of the initial proof of concept. It can
>>> safely be
>>> B> removed.
>>>
>>> Can you do this also in the same commit as the above work?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> --
>>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>>> | 24 business days until planned start of JSF 2.3 Final Approval Ballot
>>> | 14 business days until DevNexus 2017
>>> | 39 business days until JavaLand 2017
>>>
>>
>>
>