users@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts mirror] [jsr372-experts] Re: Re: Re: Report Issues of JSF 2.3 Public Review

From: Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:11:55 -0500

Hi

Checking the work done for better JSF - CDI integration, I found a
duplicate class:

javax.faces.annotation.ApplicationMap

and

javax.faces.application.ApplicationMap

The second one must be removed.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe



2017-02-04 5:33 GMT-05:00 Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com>:

> Ed, how should I deal with the now indeed unnecessary port property in
> UIWebsocket class? Spec or impl issue? It has indeed already been removed
> from vdldoc, but just overlooked in UIWebsocket.
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I created https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4223 for jsf.push
>> script matter.
>>
>> As to context params, those are defined in PushContext.
>>
>> Cheers, B
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Looking for more issues, according to the javadoc of the public review,
>>> I found UIWebsocket has "port" property. It should be removed, because the
>>> URL is customized in ViewHandler. The spec documentation and the vdldoc is
>>> ok, so the only place we need to fix is UIWebsocket. I can't find where
>>> these two constants:
>>>
>>> javax.faces.ENABLE_WEBSOCKET_ENDPOINT
>>> javax.faces.WEBSOCKET_ENDPOINT_PORT
>>>
>>> I was expecting them in ViewHandler.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-02-01 16:11 GMT-05:00 Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>:
>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:24:13 +0100, Bauke Scholtz <
>>>> balusc_at_gmail.com> said:
>>>>
>>>> EB> I suspect Bauke did that for a reason, but I would like to ask him
>>>> to
>>>> EB> make it be the same as Ajax, if possible. Bauke?
>>>>
>>>> B> Not a technical reason really. It was just a coding style which
>>>> B> advocates encapsulation. It's possible to revert it to global
>>>> B> style. I only wonder if I should create a spec or impl issue on this.
>>>>
>>>> Please create an impl issue and do the work in the MOJARRA_2_3X_ROLLING
>>>> branch. Once it is safely integrated, please use git apply <patch> to
>>>> apply it to master.
>>>>
>>>> >> Bauke, can we remove this? I can factually state it is not used
>>>> anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> B> Indeed, it was a leftover of the initial proof of concept. It can
>>>> safely be
>>>> B> removed.
>>>>
>>>> Can you do this also in the same commit as the above work?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Ed
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>>>> | 24 business days until planned start of JSF 2.3 Final Approval Ballot
>>>> | 14 business days until DevNexus 2017
>>>> | 39 business days until JavaLand 2017
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>